Jump to content

Democrats and facts


Arm of Harm
 Share

Recommended Posts

Going into the 2016 election, the DNC and its allies advanced the theory that Putin wanted Donald Trump to win the election. They claimed the Russians hacked the DNC server, so that emails which demonstrated bad faith on Hillary’s part could be shared with Wikileaks. 
 

If any of that was true, Putin’s likely motives would have been either to help Russia or to harm the U.S. During Trump’s presidency he did the following: got us out of bad trade deals, reduced illegal immigration to its lowest level in 30 years, reduced legal immigration, lowered unemployment to the lowest levels since the ‘60s, lowered black unemployment to the lowest level ever recorded, made America energy independent, and strengthened the American military. The American working class and middle class achieved solid real wage gains after decades of stagnation. In other words, he strengthened America.

 

But did he also help Russia? Well, no. Trump’s increase of domestic oil production lowered the price of oil. Russia’s biggest export is oil, and low oil prices are devastating for Russia. Under Trump, the United States sent the Ukraine much more military aid than it had received under Obama. Russia conquered the eastern third of the Ukraine during Obama’s presidency, and did not conquer additional Ukrainian territory during Trump’s presidency. Sanctions against Russia were more severe under Trump than under Obama. Trump blocked the construction of an oil pipeline from Russia to Germany, because that pipeline would have made Germany too dependent on Russia. 
 

Several months before the 2020 election, the existence of Hunter Biden’s laptop was revealed to the public. Democrats and their allies  claimed the laptop was fake. Likely planted by Russia, to help Trump win the 2020 election. What about the above-described evidence, which demonstrates that the Trump presidency was helpful to America and not helpful to Putin or Russia? Democrats ignored it. They ignored all of it, did not engage with the facts, and continued preaching Russian election interference as though it was a religious sermon.
 

“Preach your message like a religious sermon, dehumanize the opposition, and don’t engage with inconvenient facts,” is Democratic Party standard operating procedure. The Russia hoax was just one instance of that larger pattern. My question is this: why does that pattern exist? 

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Arm of Harm said:

Going into the 2016 election, the DNC and its allies advanced the theory that Putin wanted Donald Trump to win the election. They claimed the Russians hacked the DNC server, so that emails which demonstrated bad faith on Hillary’s part could be shared with Wikileaks. 
 

If any of that was true, Putin’s likely motives would have been either to help Russia or to harm the U.S. During Trump’s presidency he did the following: got us out of bad trade deals, reduced illegal immigration to its lowest level in 30 years, reduced legal immigration, lowered unemployment to the lowest levels since the ‘60s, lowered black unemployment to the lowest level ever recorded, made America energy independent, and strengthened the American military. The American working class and middle class achieved solid real wage gains after decades of stagnation. In other words, he strengthened America.

 

But did he also help Russia? Well, no. Trump’s increase of domestic oil production lowered the price of oil. Russia’s biggest export is oil, and low oil prices are devastating for Russia. Under Trump, the United States sent the Ukraine much more military aid than it had received under Obama. Russia conquered the eastern third of the Ukraine during Obama’s presidency, and did not conquer additional Ukrainian territory during Trump’s presidency. Sanctions against Russia were more severe under Trump than under Obama. Trump blocked the construction of an oil pipeline from Russia to Germany, because that pipeline would have made Germany too dependent on Russia. 
 

Several months before the 2020 election, the existence of Hunter Biden’s laptop was revealed to the public. Democrats and their allies  claimed the laptop was fake. Likely planted by Russia, to help Trump win the 2020 election. What about the above-described evidence, which demonstrates that the Trump presidency was helpful to America and not helpful to Putin or Russia? Democrats ignored it. They ignored all of it, did not engage with the facts, and continued preaching Russian election interference as though it was a religious sermon.
 

“Preach your message like a religious sermon, dehumanize the opposition, and don’t engage with inconvenient facts,” is Democratic Party standard operating procedure. The Russia hoax was just one instance of that larger pattern. My question is this: why does that pattern exist? 

because people are stupid 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Guidelines