Jump to content
Bills Fans Gear Now Available! ×

What will be the new name for the Washington Redskins?


mead107

Recommended Posts

Deranged Rhino
1 hour ago, Alaska Darin said:

It's Commanders.  2 years to come up with that terrible name.

 


So wait... 

 

They removed the Native American iconography and name out of concerns of racism and cultural appropriation — and then replaced them with the white men who conquered them instead?

 

That’s something out of Mike Judge.  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Alaska Darin said:

It's Commanders.  2 years to come up with that terrible name.

 

 

We've found a new synonym for "lame".

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
6 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:


So wait... 

 

They removed the Native American iconography and name out of concerns of racism and cultural appropriation — and then replaced them with the white men who conquered them instead?

 

That’s something out of Mike Judge.  

 

That was exactly my thought.

 

Although "commander" isn't an Army rank, so technically no commanders oppressed Injuns.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Monkey said:

 

That was exactly my thought.

 

Although "commander" isn't an Army rank, so technically no commanders oppressed Injuns.

Commander is a Naval rank.  Therefore it is raysis because ships represent European colonialism, trans-Atlantic slave trade, and American Imperialism.

 

Further, ships run on fossil fuels which contribute to Global Cooling Warming Climate Change Disruption Chaos Emergency

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Applause 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billsandhorns
2 hours ago, devnull said:

Commander is a Naval rank.  Therefore it is raysis because ships represent European colonialism, trans-Atlantic slave trade, and American Imperialism.

 

Further, ships run on fossil fuels which contribute to Global Cooling Warming Climate Change Disruption Chaos Emergency

I may be wrong, but I believe most of our Naval fleet is nuclear now

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Billsandhorns said:

I may be wrong, but I believe most of our Naval fleet is nuclear now

 

Modern subs and carriers are nuclear and maybe a handful of crusiers, everything else runs on diesel. 

 

And your focus on the modern Navy is heretical.  To be truly Progressive you must highlight the sins of the past

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
16 minutes ago, devnull said:

 

Modern subs and carriers are nuclear and maybe a handful of crusiers, everything else runs on diesel. 

 

 

All the nuclear cruisers were retired in the '90s.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crap Throwing Clavin
4 hours ago, Joe said:

Nerd

 

Be glad I deleted the diatribe on how most Navy combatants are powered by gas turbines fueled by F-76 distillate, which despite being called "marine diesel," isn't really marine diesel.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Guidelines