2024 Election Season

[Ann]

 

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

1 hour ago, Ann said:

 

 

Going to need to add a couple zeros to that to make up for the voter fraud.

[Ann]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Ann]

California Attorney General Rob Bonta and SOS Shirley Webber are suing Huntington Beach over new Voter ID measures that the city implemented after voters overwhelmingly supported it.

 

The new law will make ID mandatory to vote, increase in person voting locations, and monitor drop boxes. The democrats claim this will burden low income voters and voters of color, but also say that they already have robust ID laws in place.

 

Why would the democrats in California sue a city for securing their elections?

 

 

 

[Ann]

This is a disturbing thread

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[devnull]

 

[Ann]

8 hours ago, devnull said:

 

 

I wish this was satire.

[Ann]

 

 

[Hedge]

 

 

[RochesterRob]

On 4/15/2024 at 9:13 AM, Ann said:

 

  Too bad there is not in-state electoral votes.  The cheats in Philly will print double the bogus ballots for city precincts..  

[devnull]

[Hedge]

There won’t be enough states participating in this in 2024, but by 2028?

 

 

 

[Billsandhorns]

1 hour ago, Hedge said:

There won’t be enough states participating in this in 2024, but by 2028?

 

 

 

Are these constitutional? 

[Boyst]

2 minutes ago, Billsandhorns said:

Are these constitutional? 

I don't fully know the answer, but if you're going off of originality in the Constitution then yes. States rights are their own rights and election laws are states rights. 

[Billsandhorns]

30 minutes ago, Boyst said:

I don't fully know the answer, but if you're going off of originality in the Constitution then yes. States rights are their own rights and election laws are states rights. 

What about the compact clause? 

The Compact Clause (Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3) provides that “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... enter into Any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power.”

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

25 minutes ago, Billsandhorns said:

What about the compact clause? 

The Compact Clause (Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3) provides that “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... enter into Any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power.”

 

Not applicable, because the Constitution and Electoral College are racist and violate the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act.

 

(Just watch...that'll be the argument.)

[Boyst]

40 minutes ago, Billsandhorns said:

What about the compact clause? 

The Compact Clause (Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3) provides that “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... enter into Any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power.”

Imagine it will be hard to say they're in compact or agreement. They're just going off vote. It'd be a serious debate. 

[Billsandhorns]

28 minutes ago, Boyst said:

Imagine it will be hard to say they're in compact or agreement. They're just going off vote. It'd be a serious debate. 

They are calling it a compact

[Foxx]

When we say jump, you say, how high?

 

[Cinga]

5 hours ago, Billsandhorns said:

Are these constitutional? 

 

5 hours ago, Boyst said:

I don't fully know the answer, but if you're going off of originality in the Constitution then yes. States rights are their own rights and election laws are states rights. 

 

5 hours ago, Billsandhorns said:

What about the compact clause? 

The Compact Clause (Article 1, Section 10, Clause 3) provides that “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, ... enter into Any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power.”

 

No it should not be Constitutional. The states involved are not only entering into an illegal compact, but they are doing it to subvert the Electoral College by a mere majority vote instead of the Amendment process