Quarterback Carousel 2022 (new year starts on pg. 53)

[Foxx]

18 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Wonder if they'll try trading for Jacobi Meyers for the position...

I heard him say, "only if Chandler Jones is allowed to play WR."

[Ann]

...

 

[Foxx]

Just now, Ann said:

...

 

What happened to Willis? Was he that bad in his prior playing time?

[Alaska Darin]

44 minutes ago, Foxx said:

What happened to Willis? Was he that bad in his prior playing time?

I suspect they're just trying to keep the amount of film on him down, since this game is meaningless.

[Foxx]

6 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

I suspect they're just trying to keep the amount of film on him down, since this game is meaningless.

Still, how valuable is playing time to a rook? I don't get it really.

 

Derek Carr in their future, trading Willis?

[Foxx]

Odds on where he lands.

 

Image:

[Spartacus]

56 minutes ago, Foxx said:

What happened to Willis? Was he that bad in his prior playing time?

The OL is taking the game off

[Foxx]

13 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

The OL is taking the game off

Now that would make sense to me.

[Ann]

Lamar Jackson

 

 

 

 

[Ann]

Shesh

 

 

 

[Uncle Joe]

4 hours ago, Foxx said:

Odds on where he lands.

 

Image:

The real reason Vegas is sitting Carr.

Place your bets.

 

[devnull]

7 hours ago, Foxx said:

Odds on where he lands.

 

Image:

 

Raiders didn't bench Carr because they're done with him

 

Raiders benched Carr because they dumped a boatload of money into a contract extension and don't want their investment getting injured during a meaningless game.

 

That said, if somebody were to make a ridiculous trade offer (I'm looking in your general direction Colts and Redskins) the Raiders would listen

[Taro T]

13 minutes ago, devnull said:

 

Raiders didn't bench Carr because they're done with him

 

Raiders benched Carr because they dumped a boatload of money into a contract extension and don't want their investment getting injured during a meaningless game.

 

That said, if somebody were to make a ridiculous trade offer (I'm looking in your general direction Colts and Redskins) the Raiders would listen

 

Meaningless game?  Thought they still can land the last WC if a lot of things break their way.

 

This sure does look like an attempt to be able to move on from him if they choose to do so.

[devnull]

2 minutes ago, Taro T said:

 

Meaningless game?  Thought they still can land the last WC if a lot of things break their way.

 

This sure does look like an attempt to be able to move on from him if they choose to do so.

 

 

Okay, almost meaningless game.   So many dominoes need to fall that a Raiders playoff berth is about as likely as being struck by lightning after winning the lottery

[Taro T]

Just now, devnull said:

 

 

Okay, almost meaningless game.   So many dominoes need to fall that a Raiders playoff berth is about as likely as being struck by lightning after winning the lottery

 

Well, when they bench their starter ...

[TakeYouToTasker 2.0]

5 hours ago, Ann said:

Lamar Jackson

 

 

 

 

This makes a ton of sense, and nothing should be made of it.

 

The Ravens aren’t getting a Bye Week, and they know it.
 

They have a better chance in the playoffs with a healthy Jackson. I’d rest him for the rest of the regular season.

[devnull]

5 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker 2.0 said:

This makes a ton of sense, and nothing should be made of it.

 

The Ravens aren’t getting a Bye Week, and they know it.
 

They have a better chance in the playoffs with a healthy Jackson. I’d rest him for the rest of the regular season.

 

I understand your logic

But I would rather the Ravens have a reason to beat the Bengals in week 18.

 

Just in case...

[TakeYouToTasker 2.0]

20 minutes ago, devnull said:

 

I understand your logic

But I would rather the Ravens have a reason to beat the Bengals in week 18.

 

Just in case...

I would rather that also…  HOWEVER

 

Im not a Ravens fan, or member or the Ravens organization, or legacy department.
 

And, also, these are just my thoughts.

[TakeYouToTasker 2.0]

&#%$ Jason Peters.

[Foxx]

11 hours ago, devnull said:

 

Raiders didn't bench Carr because they're done with him

 

Raiders benched Carr because they dumped a boatload of money into a contract extension and don't want their investment getting injured during a meaningless game.

 

That said, if somebody were to make a ridiculous trade offer (I'm looking in your general direction Colts and Redskins) the Raiders would listen