COVID-19 Viruses and Vaccines

[Ann]

Sad fact

 

 

 

 

[IDBillzFan]

Good news everyone! 

 

 

[CarpetCrawler]

2 hours ago, IDBillzFan said:

Good news everyone! 

 

 

 

I have it for the 4th time right now (work in a hospital). It was a nice 5 day weekend, back to work tomorrow....and of course, they won't swab me when I go back.

[Ann]

2 minutes ago, CarpetCrawler said:

 

I have it for the 4th time right now (work in a hospital). It was a nice 5 day weekend, back to work tomorrow....and of course, they won't swab me when I go back.

I hope you feel better!

[CarpetCrawler]

2 minutes ago, Ann said:

I hope you feel better!

 

Thanks so much, it just feels like a head cold, stuffy head, and runny nose. Maybe I'm sleeping more which is a good thing overall, totally fine for work.

[Cinga]

This may be the #1 Valentine going out this year!

 

[Hedge]

 

 

[Chandemonium]

On 2/13/2024 at 1:46 PM, IDBillzFan said:

Good news everyone! 

 

 

I’ve actually seen a couple of leftist acquaintances on social media who are upset by this. Meanwhile I didn’t even know that 5 days was still the guidance, or that people were actually still getting tested.

[Spartacus]

On 2/13/2024 at 4:24 PM, CarpetCrawler said:

 

I have it for the 4th time right now (work in a hospital). It was a nice 5 day weekend, back to work tomorrow....and of course, they won't swab me when I go back.

 

https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2020/study-finds-over-80-percent-of-covid19-patients-have-vitamin-d-deficiency

 

Over 80 percent of 200 COVID-19 patients in a hospital in Spain have vitamin D deficiency, according to a new study published in the Endocrine Society’s Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34607398/

 

Conclusions: According to our results, vitamin D deficiency may increase the risk of COVID-19 infection and the likelihood of severe disease. Therefore, we recommend vitamin D supplementation to prevent COVID-19 and its negative outcomes.

 

 

 

Edited February 17 by Spartacus

[CarpetCrawler]

10 hours ago, Spartacus said:

 

https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2020/study-finds-over-80-percent-of-covid19-patients-have-vitamin-d-deficiency

 

Over 80 percent of 200 COVID-19 patients in a hospital in Spain have vitamin D deficiency, according to a new study published in the Endocrine Society’s Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34607398/

 

Conclusions: According to our results, vitamin D deficiency may increase the risk of COVID-19 infection and the likelihood of severe disease. Therefore, we recommend vitamin D supplementation to prevent COVID-19 and its negative outcomes.

 

 

 

 

My D3 was low about 15 years ago, I was even on the prescription D3 one summer (that stuff was great, I felt 10 years younger instantly). Since then I have taken 100mcg a day and my level is mid-range.

 

I also take 100mcg of K2 (MK-7), and 5,000mcg of B12, sublingual. 

 

 

[Spartacus]

1 hour ago, CarpetCrawler said:

 

My D3 was low about 15 years ago, I was even on the prescription D3 one summer (that stuff was great, I felt 10 years younger instantly). Since then I have taken 100mcg a day and my level is mid-range.

 

I also take 100mcg of K2 (MK-7), and 5,000mcg of B12, sublingual. 

 

 

D3 is critical to your health and immune system.

yet the main stream medical community refuses to include vit D testing in standard blood tests.

why is that?

 

They also intentionally advise an incredibly low number as the daily target, just to cripple patients into the annuity drug program.

[Spartacus]

Everyone know the VAERS system is worthless at holding Big Pharma accountable, 

so no harm , no foul

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/conspiracy-theory-debunker-finds-real-conspiracies

 

Let’s look at the VAERS conspiracy (recounted on pp. 274-276). Ariely says he got this information directly from a person who works “in the information technology department of the FDA.” The agency, according to the story, determined that: 

…foreign powers, mostly Russian and Iranian, had found a way to spread disinformation using VAERS. So when the FDA identified cases that had clearly come from such sources, it removed them from the system…

Not only did it delete this data, but it did so silently. Ariely only found out by accident: Parents of vaccine-injured children maintained their own copy of the VAERS data, downloaded from the FDA site. They noticed that cases appearing in their downloaded data later disappeared from the government copy of the database, and they told Ariely about this. 

 

Supposedly the FDA tried to keep these actions secret because it “did not want to announce to the foreign powers that it was onto them,” the FDA employee told him. But to anyone reasonably well-versed in information technology, keeping such acts secret is an obvious mistake. The bad guys will figure out what is going on; the folks we are trying to protect are left in the dark about possible mischief affecting data they rely on. And that’s the most charitable assessment of their actions. It could be worse: the FDA might have removed valid information inadvertently (putting aside possible nefarious intentions at this point). How might that come about? 

 

Since we don’t have details as to how the FDA found this bad data, we need to speculate. Here is the easiest scenario to imagine. A straightforward way to detect computer sessions originating in Russia or Iran is by IP (internet protocol) address. Did the FDA personnel identify the supposedly bogus entries by this method? 

 

But there’s a flaw in that approach. Many computer users obfuscate their IP address for privacy reasons. Some popular browsers such as Tor and Brave do that automatically: each browser page gets detoured through servers in different locations. Those servers are located worldwide, including in Russia. Thus if a US-based individual using the Tor browser added an entry to VAERS, and the session was routed through Russia, the FDA might well have identified this incorrectly as misinformation. 

 

Compare how the world of open-source software deals with malware. These software publishers routinely make information about vulnerabilities public, so that user organizations can both protect themselves and evaluate what damage might have been done. A publisher may wait a few days or weeks while they fix a bug and get it distributed, but then they disseminate the details. 

 

A variety of US laws and regulations even require corporations to promptly reveal data breaches that happen to them. For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission mandates that public companies report “cybersecurity incidents” within four days of determining that the incident has a “material” effect on a company’s business. 

 

VAERS is supposed to be a public resource. If FDA has a policy to remove entries, it should be transparent about its criteria, and make the data available for audit. Or it could just as easily have flagged the entries as “suspicious origin” and left them in the database. Then others could review their judgment and either confirm or dispute the classifications.

[Fansince88]

13 hours ago, Spartacus said:

 

https://www.endocrine.org/news-and-advocacy/news-room/2020/study-finds-over-80-percent-of-covid19-patients-have-vitamin-d-deficiency

 

Over 80 percent of 200 COVID-19 patients in a hospital in Spain have vitamin D deficiency, according to a new study published in the Endocrine Society’s Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

 

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34607398/

 

Conclusions: According to our results, vitamin D deficiency may increase the risk of COVID-19 infection and the likelihood of severe disease. Therefore, we recommend vitamin D supplementation to prevent COVID-19 and its negative outcomes.

 

 

 

That has been the story since day 1. I have been taking one of dr Bergs Vit D coctails since the BP meds made me deficient in D, Magnesium, and calcium in September. Drs there didnt think being extremely efficient in these and causing some severe Tachycardia could possibly be brought on by this medication. My studies showed it to be the case. I quit taking them and it went away. 

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

3 hours ago, Spartacus said:

Everyone know the VAERS system is worthless at holding Big Pharma accountable, 

so no harm , no foul

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/conspiracy-theory-debunker-finds-real-conspiracies

 

Let’s look at the VAERS conspiracy (recounted on pp. 274-276). Ariely says he got this information directly from a person who works “in the information technology department of the FDA.” The agency, according to the story, determined that: 

…foreign powers, mostly Russian and Iranian, had found a way to spread disinformation using VAERS. So when the FDA identified cases that had clearly come from such sources, it removed them from the system…

Not only did it delete this data, but it did so silently. Ariely only found out by accident: Parents of vaccine-injured children maintained their own copy of the VAERS data, downloaded from the FDA site. They noticed that cases appearing in their downloaded data later disappeared from the government copy of the database, and they told Ariely about this. 

 

Supposedly the FDA tried to keep these actions secret because it “did not want to announce to the foreign powers that it was onto them,” the FDA employee told him. But to anyone reasonably well-versed in information technology, keeping such acts secret is an obvious mistake. The bad guys will figure out what is going on; the folks we are trying to protect are left in the dark about possible mischief affecting data they rely on. And that’s the most charitable assessment of their actions. It could be worse: the FDA might have removed valid information inadvertently (putting aside possible nefarious intentions at this point). How might that come about? 

 

Since we don’t have details as to how the FDA found this bad data, we need to speculate. Here is the easiest scenario to imagine. A straightforward way to detect computer sessions originating in Russia or Iran is by IP (internet protocol) address. Did the FDA personnel identify the supposedly bogus entries by this method? 

 

But there’s a flaw in that approach. Many computer users obfuscate their IP address for privacy reasons. Some popular browsers such as Tor and Brave do that automatically: each browser page gets detoured through servers in different locations. Those servers are located worldwide, including in Russia. Thus if a US-based individual using the Tor browser added an entry to VAERS, and the session was routed through Russia, the FDA might well have identified this incorrectly as misinformation. 

 

Compare how the world of open-source software deals with malware. These software publishers routinely make information about vulnerabilities public, so that user organizations can both protect themselves and evaluate what damage might have been done. A publisher may wait a few days or weeks while they fix a bug and get it distributed, but then they disseminate the details. 

 

A variety of US laws and regulations even require corporations to promptly reveal data breaches that happen to them. For example, the Securities and Exchange Commission mandates that public companies report “cybersecurity incidents” within four days of determining that the incident has a “material” effect on a company’s business. 

 

VAERS is supposed to be a public resource. If FDA has a policy to remove entries, it should be transparent about its criteria, and make the data available for audit. Or it could just as easily have flagged the entries as “suspicious origin” and left them in the database. Then others could review their judgment and either confirm or dispute the classifications.

 

Still don't understand VAERS, do you? 

[Nouseforaname]

10 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Still don't understand anything VAERS, do you? 

FTFY.

Edited February 18 by Nouseforaname

[Nouseforaname]

I didn’t know @Spartacus was behind this twitter account.

[Spartacus]

jabs- 100% safe and effective

-at killing you slowly

 

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/vaccines-can-impact-long-term-survival-from-other-diseases-study-5559895?utm_source=healthnoe&src_src=healthnoe&utm_campaign=health-2024-02-19&src_cmp=health-2024-02-19&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAbOgkJEpUneHL474Nv3ZNRbp%2F31%2FyqHFiK9b24IczW9b5GA0%3D

 

Apart from potentially preventing a particular disease, vaccines may cause persistent nonspecific effects that can affect a person’s lifetime survival.

 

In a review published on Dec. 26, 2023, in Vaccine, researchers found that non-live vaccines such as influenza, COVID-19, hepatitis B, and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) tend to cause adverse nonspecific effects (NSE), increasing a person’s risks of all-cause mortality and infections from other diseases.

 

A live vaccine contains a weakened form of the pathogen, which is less virulent but capable of replicating in the body, thus mimicking the actual disease progression. Non-live vaccines use inactivated viruses, fragments, or genes of the pathogen to trigger an immune response without pathogen replication.

 

Live vaccines elicit a much stronger immune defense, typically requiring only one shot, while non-live vaccines result in a weaker response, often necessitating multiple shots.

[Uncle Joe]

13 hours ago, Nouseforaname said:

I didn’t know @Spartacus was behind this twitter account.

I would have guessed Trojan tinhat at USC.

[Deranged Rhino]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/largest-covid-vaccine-study-yet-finds-links-to-health-conditions

[Spartacus]

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/largest-covid-vaccine-study-yet-finds-links-to-health-conditions

100% safe and effective