COVID-19 Viruses and Vaccines

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

8 minutes ago, Foxx said:

mRNA is unprecedented

well, other than the 9 previous shots...

 

And the reason we haven't cured the common cold is because 40% of the viruses that cause it are coronaviruses...and the damn things mutate fast.

 

Has far less to do with the vaccine being mRNA-based that it does that it's stupid to try to vaccinate against a coronavirus.

[Foxx]

12 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

Has far less to do with the vaccine being mRNA-based

Not sure I agree with this.

 

12 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

it's stupid to try to vaccinate against a coronavirus.

I do agree with this.

[Spartacus]

1 hour ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

Has far less to do with the vaccine being mRNA-based that it does that it's stupid to try to vaccinate against a coronavirus.

probably why the jab is no longer a "vaccine"

[Fansince88]

7 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

There's a different flu shot every year, so it's not unprecedented.

 

But 10 in four years?  That's ridiculous.

Yes, and the flu shot has done so much good. 🙃 

[Nouseforaname]

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

Not sure I agree with this.

 

I 

Based on what ?

[Fansince88]

1 minute ago, Nouseforaname said:

Based on what ?

Oh boy. Here we go again. I have seen this show before. 

[Nouseforaname]

2 minutes ago, Fansince88 said:

Oh boy. Here we go again. I have seen this show before. 

Thanks for your reply. 

[Fansince88]

4 minutes ago, Nouseforaname said:

Thanks for your reply. 

Is this not the point where you say yes it is and someone else says no it isnt and then you say yes it is and they say no it isnt and you are stupid and it goes on and on for 5 pages? 

 

Like I said, seen this show before. Only it has been a miniseries in the past. 

Edited March 6 by Fansince88

[Foxx]

1 hour ago, Nouseforaname said:

Based on what ?

Well, mRNA, also known as gene therapy, is new. It didn't go through regular trials, it was live tested on billions of human guinea pigs.

 

Had they done regular trials, with all the complications that are coming to light, I'm not sure it would have gotten out of the trial phase.

[Nouseforaname]

39 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Well, mRNA, also known as gene therapy, is new. It didn't go through regular trials, it was live tested on a billions of human guinea pigs.

 

Had they done regular trials, with all the complications that are coming to light, I'm not sure it would have gotten out of the trial phase.

And yet J&J, AstraZeneca and other non mRNA vaccines suffer from the same issues with respect to stopping the spread. In fact, astra and J&J had worse adverse effects and those are classic vaccines.

 

Mrna has been in development and was potentially going to be used for treatment of some cancers for over twenty years. 

[Nouseforaname]

42 minutes ago, Foxx said:

Well, mRNA, also known as gene therapy, is new. It didn't go through regular trials, it was live tested on a billions of human guinea pigs.

 

Had they done regular trials, with all the complications that are coming to light, I'm not sure it would have gotten out of the trial phase.

Thanks for your reply.

[Foxx]

16 minutes ago, Nouseforaname said:

And yet J&J, AstraZeneca and other non mRNA vaccines suffer from the same issues with respect to stopping the spread. In fact, astra and J&J had worse adverse effects and those are classic vaccines.

They're only vaccines because they changed the definition of the word, vaccine. In a historical/classic sense, there's no &#%$ing way they're vaccines.

 

19 minutes ago, Nouseforaname said:

Mrna has been in development and was potentially going to be used for treatment of some cancers for over twenty years. 

Have they gone through clinicals? Why are they not out after 20 years of testing?

[Nouseforaname]

2 minutes ago, Foxx said:

They're only vaccines because they changed the definition of the word, vaccine. In a historical/classic sense, there's no &#%$ing way they're vaccines.

 

Have they gone through clinicals? Why are they not out after 20 years of testing?

Which? mRNA or the J&J vaccines?

[Nouseforaname]

23 minutes ago, Nouseforaname said:

Thanks for your reply.

@Foxx this was meant for the other guy.  Replied ton quickly.

[Jabba The Hutt]

4 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

And the reason we haven't cured the common cold is because 40% of the viruses that cause it are coronaviruses...and the damn things mutate fast.

 

Has far less to do with the vaccine being mRNA-based that it does that it's stupid to try to vaccinate against a coronavirus.

Second part yes... 1st part LOL.

 

We haven't cured ANY disease because that's not what the medical field does. They make sure diseases are lifelong problems so they have lifelong customers.

 

Examples:

Diabetes: Reversible therefore "curable"

Cancer: Reversible therefore "curable"

Heart Disease: Reversible therefore "curable"

 

The list goes on and on and is as long as the lies about "curability" of diseases.

Edited March 6 by Jabba The Hutt

[Jabba The Hutt]

Was I wrong somewhere @Nouseforaname?

[Nouseforaname]

14 minutes ago, Jabba The Hutt said:

Was I wrong somewhere @Nouseforaname?

Yes. 

[Fansince88]

6 hours ago, Jabba The Hutt said:

Was I wrong somewhere @Nouseforaname?

From what I have seen in the last couple of years. Spot on. 

[Nouseforaname]

1 hour ago, Fansince88 said:

From what I have seen in the last couple of years. Spot on. 

I’m sure your analysis is thorough and accurate. 

[Spartacus]

12 hours ago, Fansince88 said:

Yes, and the flu shot has done so much good. 🙃 

you get the flu shot

you get the flu

100% effective