Official 'Other Divisional Round Games' Thread

[Foxx]

Burrow does Tannehill things, Burrow throws an int.

[Uncle Joe]

Oopsie, damn hookers.

[Core Four]

Just now, Foxx said:

Burrow does Tannehill things, Burrow throws an int.

 

Ball was thrown outside and a little too hard

[SpionBills]

That’s looking like as incomplete 

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

I don't think that's an interception...but I think it's too inconclusive on review to overturn.

[Alaska Darin]

That doesn't look like a catch to me. 

[Cinga]

yeah, I think that hit the ground

[Joe Miner]

2 hours ago, snafu said:

Mixon scares me.

 

 

Why? Are you dating him?

[Uncle Joe]

Should we check with our tinfoil hat guy to see who the refs want

[Ann]

Wow

[snafu]

I think that’s a good call. The ground had no effect on the act of catching it. 

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

1 minute ago, Alaska Darin said:

That doesn't look like a catch to me. 

 

The announcing crew is splitting hairs, ridiculously.

 

If that were a reception, it would easily be ruled incomplete - it touched the ground, he didn't have control and complete a football move.  But since it's an interception, not a reception...so the definition of "catch" is different?  

[Cinga]

A new generation Music City bullshit call

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

1 minute ago, Uncle Joe said:

Should we check with our tinfoil hat guy to see who the refs want

 

The review took so long because they had to call the CDC to see who was and wasn't jabbed on the play.

[snafu]

Just now, Crap Throwing Monkey said:

 

The announcing crew is splitting hairs, ridiculously.

 

If that were a reception, it would easily be ruled incomplete - it touched the ground, he didn't have control and complete a football move.  But since it's an interception, not a reception...so the definition of "catch" is different?  

I think they changed the rule about the ball hitting the ground this season. 

[Alaska Darin]

Just now, Crap Throwing Monkey said:

 

The announcing crew is splitting hairs, ridiculously.

 

If that were a reception, it would easily be ruled incomplete - it touched the ground, he didn't have control and complete a football move.  But since it's an interception, not a reception...so the definition of "catch" is different?  

They are so afraid to be wrong.

 

I don't think it was a catch but there wasn't enough there to overturn it. 

[Cinga]

Just now, snafu said:

I think that’s a good call. The ground had no effect on the act of catching it. 

 

you can't catch a ball off the ground and if it touches it in the act of making the catch it is incomplete

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

Jesus, what a catch by Brown.  

[Ann]

Titans right back in it.

[Foxx]

4 minutes ago, Alaska Darin said:

I don't think it does. I'm going for 2 from the one more often than not. 

If it costs them the game, it will be looked upon as a mistake.  With a chance to take the lead, I'm not sure you do it.