COVID-19 Viruses and Vaccines

[devnull]

6 minutes ago, Ann said:

Hmmmm

 

 

 

 

Which will be vetoed by Xiden and the Democrats have enough safe seats to prevent an override

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

5 hours ago, devnull said:

Which will be vetoed by Xiden and the Democrats have enough safe seats to prevent an override

 

Doesn't even need to be vetoed.  Executive will argue that Congress has no authority over classification.  That'll be tested in the courts, and maybe the Supreme Court will say otherwise.  But that'll take at least three years, and probably more.  At which point DNI would slow-roll the roll-out, and redact everything heavily, and that would turn into another political fight.

 

Congress has simply passed a complete irrelevancy, bless their hearts.  

[devnull]

49 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Doesn't even need to be vetoed.  Executive will argue that Congress has no authority over classification.  That'll be tested in the courts, and maybe the Supreme Court will say otherwise.  But that'll take at least three years, and probably more.  At which point DNI would slow-roll the roll-out, and redact everything heavily, and that would turn into another political fight.

 

Congress has simply passed a complete irrelevancy, bless their hearts.  

 

Oooh oooh.  Mr Kotter, Mr Kotter

 

You're an idiot 

 

US Constitution Article 1, Section 7 states:

If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a law.

 

If Biden doesn't veto it, it becomes law.

If Biden does not comply, he is in willful violation of an act of Congress

 

Yeah yeah, I know 😞

[Fansince88]

On 3/9/2023 at 9:51 AM, Cinga said:

 

Then someone should have given him a bigger megaphone 📣

Listened to a bit of this session on "And We Know" today. He had as big a megaphone as the megaphone holders would allow.

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

2 hours ago, devnull said:

 

Oooh oooh.  Mr Kotter, Mr Kotter

 

You're an idiot 

 

US Constitution Article 1, Section 7 states:

If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a law.

 

If Biden doesn't veto it, it becomes law.

If Biden does not comply, he is in willful violation of an act of Congress

 

Yeah yeah, I know 😞

 

Yeah, and then it's ignored, because Congress has no standing to decide on classifications.  He'd be in willful violation of an unconstitutional act of Congress.  Then it goes to the courts. 

 

So it doesn't need to be vetoed...it can be completely ignored.

 

Edit: part of the applicable statute:  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3164#2

 

Adding it because paragraph 2 is fascinating.

 

Quote

the term “classified information” means any information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order No. 12356

 

The legislative authority over classification is so entirely non-existent that the legislature itself defers to executive order to define "classified information."  This bill is a completely empty gesture.

Edited March 11, 2023 by Crap Throwing Clavin

[Cinga]

31 minutes ago, Fansince88 said:

Listened to a bit of this session on "And We Know" today. He had as big a megaphone as the megaphone holders would allow.

 

Yeah, I like listening to him too, has great info! Besides, he's also a Marine! 

[Fansince88]

21 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Yeah, and then it's ignored, because Congress has no standing to decide on classifications.  He'd be in willful violation of an unconstitutional act of Congress.  Then it goes to the courts. 

 

So it doesn't need to be vetoed...it can be completely ignored.

 

Edit: part of the applicable statute:  https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/3164#2

 

Adding it because paragraph 2 is fascinating.

 

 

The legislative authority over classification is so entirely non-existent that the legislature itself defers to executive order to define "classified information."  This bill is a completely empty gesture.

Reminds me of this:

 

[4merper4mer]

12 hours ago, devnull said:

 

Oooh oooh.  Mr Kotter, Mr Kotter

 

You're an idiot 

 

US Constitution Article 1, Section 7 states:

If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the same shall be a law, in like manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return, in which case it shall not be a law.

 

If Biden doesn't veto it, it becomes law.

If Biden does not comply, he is in willful violation of an act of Congress

 

Yeah yeah, I know 😞

I wonder why the part in parentheses has never been attacked as a violation of separation of church and state as so many other things have been.  There is only one reason Sundays don’t count.  Everyone knows that reason.  But here we are arguing about the word God in the pledge.

[devnull]

4 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I wonder why the part in parentheses has never been attacked as a violation of separation of church and state as so many other things have been.  There is only one reason Sundays don’t count.  Everyone knows that reason.  But here we are arguing about the word God in the pledge.

 

Because even atheists enjoy the day off

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

6 hours ago, 4merper4mer said:

I wonder why the part in parentheses has never been attacked as a violation of separation of church and state as so many other things have been.  There is only one reason Sundays don’t count.  Everyone knows that reason.  But here we are arguing about the word God in the pledge.

 

Plus, it discriminates against Jews and Eastern Orthodox Christians, whose Sabbath is Saturday.  And Muslims, whose equivalent of the Sabbath is Friday.

 

So not just violating separation of church and state...but racist.

[Cinga]

9 hours ago, devnull said:

 

Because even atheists enjoy the day off

 

Atheists don't really enjoy anything. How can there be joy thinking in the end there is nothing?

 

6 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Plus, it discriminates against Jews and Eastern Orthodox Christians, whose Sabbath is Saturday.  And Muslims, whose equivalent of the Sabbath is Friday.

 

So not just violating separation of church and state...but racist.

 

I get that so many think Sabbath has to be a particular day, but the literal translation from the root simply means to cease exertion, rest and celebrate. It's an instruction to take a day of rest, and because it was what we perceive as Saturday (or Sunday as the case may be) that God did, many assume that is the day we should take. Ironically though, I hope you realize that that day is also the busiest day of the week for the Pastors, Priests, Imans, or Rabbis that teach us to rest that day.

However Christians (hopefully) learn that Jesus told us in Mark 2 that

"The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of Man is Lord, even of the Sabbath."

So you see, Christians find their rest in Jesus, not in any particular day set aside for it. He established Himself here (and in other verses) as the Creator and let's be realistic, God didn't need a day of rest, He's God after all! But man most certainly does.

 

Finally, I know your final comment was in jest, but race has nothing to  do with religion, yet politics sure has a lot to do with race

[Nouseforaname]

42 minutes ago, Cinga said:

 

Atheists don't really enjoy anything. How can there be joy thinking in the end there is nothing?

 

 

We live in the moment.  

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

13 hours ago, Cinga said:

Finally, I know your final comment was in jest, but race has nothing to  do with religion, yet politics sure has a lot to do with race

 

Of course.  It was a slam at progressives who think everything - culture, religion, ethnicity, personal income, coiffures - is "race."  

[Fansince88]

5 hours ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said:

 

Of course.  It was a slam at progressives who think everything - culture, religion, ethnicity, personal income, coiffures - is "race."  

1 Corinthians 9 agrees with them in a sense.  I too am in a race.

 

1 Corinthians 9:24-27 24Do you not know that those who run in a race all run, but one receives the prize? Run in such a way that you may obtain it. 25And everyone who competes for the prize is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a perishable crown, but we for an imperishable crown. 26Therefore I run thus: not with uncertainty. Thus I fight: not as one who beats the air. 27But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest, when I have preached to others, I myself should become disqualified.

[Alaska Darin]

[Ann]

To reach a conclusion...
 

 

[Spartacus]

11 minutes ago, Ann said:

To reach a conclusion...
 

 

latest splash news to divert attention from US creating bio-weapons at Ft Detrick and Ukraine labs,

and subsequent release at direction of The Establishment at  select locations to foster their fear porn campaign

[Spartacus]

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/natural-immunity-is-as-protective-as-covid-jab_5108821.html?utm_source=healthnoe&src_src=healthnoe&utm_campaign=health-2023-03-13&src_cmp=health-2023-03-13&utm_medium=email&est=AQyrMR0IqjJRyWQszuVX8TR%2BkRbrwpku62Kruaqb2XJs5efcUlAUh%2Fj%2FV5ubN10%3D

 

• Overall, infection-acquired immunity decreased the risk of hospitalization and death from a COVID reinfection by 88 percent for a minimum of 10 months. For comparison, previous studies have shown the efficacy of two COVID shots wanes to BELOW zero by the sixth month, meaning the effectiveness becomes negative, making you more prone to infection than you were before.

 

A MASTER’S COURSE IN DATA MANIPULATION

The data manipulation that doggedly persistent analysts have unearthed over the past three years truly boggles the mind. Governments around the world have been caught using every conceivable trick to obscure data that would otherwise break the narrative that COVID-19 is a significant threat, early treatment doesn’t work, and the experimental COVID jabs are safe and effective.

 

GUIDE TO DECEIVING THE PUBLIC ABOUT VACCINE EFFECTIVENESS

Here’s a summary of Fenton’s and Neil’s five-step “foolproof method to ensure a vaccine will be accepted as highly effective:”

1. Employ statistical tricks and biases that result in exaggerated claims, and suppress legitimate criticism.-
2. Select a study method that is easier to manipulate, such as test-negative case-control studies, which, by the way, was one of the three types of studies included in the Gates-funded Lancet study above. Then, publish in a “reputable” yet “bought and sold” journal.
3. Ignore COVID infections that occur within 14 days of participants getting the first jab. These people are not even counted as “partially vaccinated” as they’re only partially vaccinated on Day 14 after their first dose. As noted by Fenton and Neil: “Imagine the most extreme case in which every vaccinated person gets COVID within the first two weeks of their first dose. Then, assuming (as is likely) that none get infected a second time within the 19 weeks, according to the study definition, no vaccinated people ever got COVID over the whole period of the study. If only one person in the unvaccinated comparative cohort had got COVID, over the same period, the vaccine efficacy (defined as one minus the proportion of vaccinated infected divided by the proportion of unvaccinated infected times 100) will be reported as 100 percent.”
4. Don’t test for COVID and/or ignore test results.
5. And lastly, “ignore outcomes that make your vaccine look ineffective.” For example, in the study used for this “guide,” 1,482 participants tested positive for COVID and had at least one symptom; 812 of them were unvaccinated. Only 2 percent required hospitalization and there were no deaths, giving us a total infection fatality of zero percent. This important outcome was ignored throughout the paper and was only mentioned once in the detailed results section.

 

CREATE THE VIRUS AND GET PAID FOR THE VACCINE

In related news, Moderna recently agreed to pay $400 million to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for the patent it holds to its mRNA shot. 

 

According to Fierce Pharma,²² Moderna revealed in its latest earnings statement that the company had agreed to “a $400 million ‘catch-up payment’ under a new royalty-bearing license agreement between the parties.”

 

So does the payment hit the company hard? “Moderna pulled down around $36 billion in COVID-19 vaccine sales across 2021 and 2022, its two big launch years,” Fierce Pharma said, adding, “While the $400 million payment represents only around 1 percent of the company’s total COVID-19 vaccine sales over that span, the lump-sum nature of the ‘catch-up payment’ drove up Moderna’s fourth quarter’s costs.”

 

So this is quite the racket the NIAID has going. First, it helps create the virus, and then it gets royalty payments for the supposed “vaccine!”

[IDBillzFan]

On 3/11/2023 at 7:18 PM, Nouseforaname said:

 

We live in the moment.  

 

Until that final moment.

[IDBillzFan]

Did you know that Covid is killing about 30,000 people every month?