Ann Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Yeah, but at least we've still got this guy! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninety-4 Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 On 3/23/2024 at 4:54 PM, Ann said: I'm not going to miss those shorts. Now only if I could un-see this. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 Can't help but think Beane has something in the works. I mean i get it, Diggs has been a bit questionable the last couple years but you just don't give up WR 1&2 for only Samuel. While Shakir really came on toward the end of the season, is he really ready to be a 1 or 2? Other than Reserve/Future players which includes Isabella and Shaver, we have 4 receivers on the roster, newly signed Hollins and Samuel with holdovers Shakir and Shorter Perhaps WR trade with Vikings 2.0? Or has he decided the receiver he wants in the draft is within reach? 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blessed Believer Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 11 minutes ago, Cinga said: Can't help but think Beane has something in the works. I mean i get it, Diggs has been a bit questionable the last couple years but you just don't give up WR 1&2 for only Samuel. While Shakir really came on toward the end of the season, is he really ready to be a 1 or 2? Other than Reserve/Future players which includes Isabella and Shaver, we have 4 receivers on the roster, newly signed Hollins and Samuel with holdovers Shakir and Shorter Perhaps WR trade with Vikings 2.0? Or has he decided the receiver he wants in the draft is within reach? Can we get Isaiah McKenzie back? He’s not a one, but he does so many cool things with his speed and maneuverability. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blessed Believer Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 I bet there are plenty of #2 and #3 type WRs available now as we speak as free agents. I hope Bills can move up and grab a potential #1 WR in the draft. We should try to trade with Joe Schoen since he owes us something fierce for fleecing our coaches and players. Give him our #1 and a #2 and our #1 next year to move up to #6 in round one. Then we can be assured we have a stud. -BB Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 minute ago, Blessed Believer said: Can we get Isaiah McKenzie back? He’s not a one, but he does so many cool things with his speed and maneuverability. Nice handle! But please, no McKenzie. Other than a splash play or 2 a season he either drops too many passes or fumbles too much. I'm with most that hoped he would step into the slot role after Beas but man, that was a disappointing results Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crap Throwing Clavin Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 17 minutes ago, Blessed Believer said: I bet there are plenty of #2 and #3 type WRs available now as we speak as free agents. I hope Bills can move up and grab a potential #1 WR in the draft. We should try to trade with Joe Schoen since he owes us something fierce for fleecing our coaches and players. Give him our #1 and a #2 and our #1 next year to move up to #6 in round one. Then we can be assured we have a stud. -BB You all know what my response to this has to be, right? 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billsandhorns Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 36 minutes ago, Blessed Believer said: Can we get Isaiah McKenzie back? He’s not a one, but he does so many cool things with his speed and maneuverability. He has issues catching or holding on to the ball for that matter. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blessed Believer Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 44 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said: You all know what my response to this has to be, right? I don’t……to move up from 28 to 6 is pretty drastic. We would have to give them more than just a late one and a middle 2. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ann Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 1 hour ago, Blessed Believer said: I don’t……to move up from 28 to 6 is pretty drastic. We would have to give them more than just a late one and a middle 2. Tom has a catch phrase. Don't get offended by it, it means he likes you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahoney Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 52 minutes ago, Crap Throwing Clavin said: You all know what my response to this has to be, right? I'd like to buy a vowel 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 3 minutes ago, Mahoney said: I'd like to buy a vowel An "A"? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahoney Posted April 3 Share Posted April 3 4 minutes ago, Hedge said: An "A"? Yes! It was A-D-E-P-T. Way to go! 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinga Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 1 hour ago, Blessed Believer said: I don’t……to move up from 28 to 6 is pretty drastic. We would have to give them more than just a late one and a middle 2. If we were going to give up that much I think I would prefer Jefferson from the Vikings, in fact in a year so deep in receivers I think he might be cheaper than that trade up scenario 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vark Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 1 hour ago, Ann said: Tom has a catch phrase. Don't get offended by it, it means he likes you. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 4 minutes ago, Cinga said: If we were going to give up that much I think I would prefer Jefferson from the Vikings, in fact in a year so deep in receivers I think he might be cheaper than that trade up scenario Depends on how Jefferson's contract could be structured. I don't want a multi-year deal like we just had with Diggs. Going up to 6 assuming MHJ or Nabers is there would most likely guarantee an opening day starter. Less certain with the other options. I might be pleasantly surprised with what our current offensive players may accomplish but I would not mind a prospect who would be a certain safety blanket for that group. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alaska Darin Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 On 4/3/2024 at 5:28 PM, Blessed Believer said: Can we get Isaiah McKenzie back? He’s not a one, but he does so many cool things with his speed and maneuverability. IM6 is "just a guy" - there will be multiple players in the late rounds of the draft that can do what he does at a fraction of the price with the upside of possibly developing into a reliable receiver who can diagnose a defense on the fly. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nouseforaname Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ninety-4 Posted April 4 Share Posted April 4 15 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: Depends on how Jefferson's contract could be structured. I don't want a multi-year deal like we just had with Diggs. Going up to 6 assuming MHJ or Nabers is there would most likely guarantee an opening day starter. Less certain with the other options. I might be pleasantly surprised with what our current offensive players may accomplish but I would not mind a prospect who would be a certain safety blanket for that group. MHJ likely gone way before 6. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.