[positional grouping] Bills Offensive Line

[Fansince88]

27 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

this is true,

but it does not fit the narrative of certain posters favoriong dinosaur ball

I dont get this.

[Spartacus]

16 minutes ago, Fansince88 said:

I dont get this.

certain expert posters maintain that

you need to be able to run the ball up the gut

and everywhere else on demand

and stonewall DTs

which requires a much more physcial C

 

hence, Morris is not worth his cap hit and needs to be replaced with a road grader

ignoring the fact that the Bills are passing offense where pass protecting and setting protections is of utmost importance

 

Part of same plan to move Dawkins to G and cut his salary

[Fansince88]

1 minute ago, Spartacus said:

certain expert posters maintain that

you need to be able to run the ball up the gut

and everywhere else on demand

and stonewall DTs

which requires a much more physcial C

 

hence, Morris is not worth his cap hit and needs to be replaced with a road grader

ignoring the fact that the Bills are passing offense where pass protecting and setting protections is of utmost importance

 

Part of same plan to move Dawkins to G and cut his salary

I'm of the opinion that you need a RB that CAN run it up the gut. I dont think that is all on the line. But the share of blame is there too.

[Crap Throwing Clavin]

5 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

certain expert posters maintain that

you need to be able to run the ball up the gut

and everywhere else on demand

and stonewall DTs

which requires a much more physcial C

 

hence, Morris is not worth his cap hit and needs to be replaced with a road grader

ignoring the fact that the Bills are passing offense where pass protecting and setting protections is of utmost importance

 

Part of same plan to move Dawkins to G and cut his salary

 

Your football conspiracy theories are even dumber than your regular conspiracy theories.

[Foxx]

That was fast!

 

[Fansince88]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

That was fast!

 

How many 1 year signings is that so far?

[Foxx]

4 minutes ago, Fansince88 said:

How many 1 year signings is that so far?

More than 1?

[Fansince88]

20 minutes ago, Foxx said:

More than 1?

I mean this years roster.

 

[Foxx]

1 minute ago, Fansince88 said:

I mean this years roster.

 

More than 1?

[Augie]

37 minutes ago, Fansince88 said:

I'm of the opinion that you need a RB that CAN run it up the gut. I dont think that is all on the line. But the share of blame is there too.

 

Let’s bring Kromer in to make sense of it all. It was very strange how we couldn’t run last year……until we could. 

[Fansince88]

5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

More than 1?

I know of 2.

[Fansince88]

Just now, Augie said:

 

Let’s bring Kromer in to make sense of it all. It was very strange how we couldn’t run last year……until we could  did. 

FIFY

[Foxx]

Any bets on whether or not Belly boy is going to tender Bates a high number to make it so can't sign him?

 

[Augie]

I don’t know this aspect well, but I’m surprised he didn’t get the higher tender. Would we have gotten a 2nd round pick if he left? Was it “just” $1.5 mil different? 

[Augie]

Mancz’s mother is apparently very athletic. A college buddy gave her a tennis lesson this morning. Volleyball player. I see this as the key to our upcoming Super Bowl victory. 

[Foxx]

15 minutes ago, Augie said:

I don’t know this aspect well, but I’m surprised he didn’t get the higher tender. Would we have gotten a 2nd round pick if he left? Was it “just” $1.5 mil different? 

Good question. One I do not know the answer to. Whatever it is/was, good chance Beane thought it too high a price.

[Core Four]

1 hour ago, Fansince88 said:

How many 1 year signings is that so far?

 

I get what you're saying, there has been a number of one and two year signings.  Low risk, prove it deals which will allow the FO to decide who they want to keep and commit longer contracts to. 

[Fansince88]

56 minutes ago, Core Four said:

 

I get what you're saying, there has been a number of one and two year signings.  Low risk, prove it deals which will allow the FO to decide who they want to keep and commit longer contracts to. 

It wasnt a complaint as much as just an observation.  

[TakeYouToTasker 2.0]

10 hours ago, Fansince88 said:

I know of 2.

More than one still.

[Spartacus]

13 hours ago, Core Four said:

 

I get what you're saying, there has been a number of one and two year signings.  Low risk, prove it deals which will allow the FO to decide who they want to keep and commit longer contracts to. 

Long term plan is to build the comp pick pipeline, based on expiring short term contracts