COVID-19 Viruses and Vaccines

[Fansince88]

6 hours ago, Foxx said:

Yeah, okay. We shall see...

 

So, another indictment Monday morning?

[Ann]

The total is about $1.5M to charity for Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr on Joe Rogan. Right now, Hotez is not doing it. Crazytown. 

I posted the details here.
 

 

[Ann]

 

 

[Ann]

Ok

 

 

 

 

[Ann]

Wow
 

 

 

 

[Nouseforaname]

On 6/18/2023 at 8:50 AM, Ann said:

The total is about $1.5M to charity for Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr on Joe Rogan. Right now, Hotez is not doing it. Crazytown. 

I posted the details here.
 

 

Could we have someone a bit better than this dipshit with a bow tie ?

[IDBillzFan]

59 minutes ago, Nouseforaname said:

Could we have someone a bit better than this dipshit with a bow tie ?

 

All the best scientists wear bowties.

 

[devnull]

7 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

All the best scientists wear bowties.

 

 

And if you ask me which one I trust most...

[IDBillzFan]

Just now, devnull said:

 

And if you ask me which one I trust most...

 

Mr. Peabody, and it isn't even close. 

[Ann]

DOCUMENTS LINK POTENTIAL COVID PATIENT ZERO TO U.S.-FUNDED RESEARCH IN WUHAN

New reporting, attributed to U.S. government sources, identified a coronavirus researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology who fell ill in November 2019.

 

One of the first Wuhan researchers reportedly sickened with Covid in fall 2019, Ben Hu, was getting U.S. financial support for risky gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by the transparency advocacy organization White Coat Waste Project.

 

The funding came in three grants totaling $41 million, doled out by USAID and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, or NIAID, the agency then headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci. Hu is listed as an investigator on the grants.

 

</snip>

[Spartacus]

1 hour ago, Ann said:

DOCUMENTS LINK POTENTIAL COVID PATIENT ZERO TO U.S.-FUNDED RESEARCH IN WUHAN

New reporting, attributed to U.S. government sources, identified a coronavirus researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology who fell ill in November 2019.

 

One of the first Wuhan researchers reportedly sickened with Covid in fall 2019, Ben Hu, was getting U.S. financial support for risky gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by the transparency advocacy organization White Coat Waste Project.

 

The funding came in three grants totaling $41 million, doled out by USAID and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, or NIAID, the agency then headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci. Hu is listed as an investigator on the grants.

 

</snip>

US funded it, developed the virus, released it, created the bio-weapon jab, rolled it out to and coordinated the entire fear porn episode

[Foxx]

 

[devnull]

9 hours ago, Spartacus said:

US funded it, developed the virus, released it, created the bio-weapon jab, rolled it out to and coordinated the entire fear porn episode

 

I still don't think it was released intentionally.  Call me an optimist, but I still think it was a leak

 

That said, once it was leaked, the "Never let a crisis go to waste" wing of the DNC/Deep State (but I repeat myself) went into action

[Spartacus]

2 hours ago, devnull said:

 

I still don't think it was released intentionally.  Call me an optimist, but I still think it was a leak

 

That said, once it was leaked, the "Never let a crisis go to waste" wing of the DNC/Deep State (but I repeat myself) went into action

leaked in China - maybe

released in NYC for maximum destruction to initiate the fear porn agenda in the US

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Hedge]

8 hours ago, devnull said:

 

I still don't think it was released intentionally.  Call me an optimist, but I still think it was a leak

 

That said, once it was leaked, the "Never let a crisis go to waste" wing of the DNC/Deep State (but I repeat myself) went into action

 

No matter intentional or not, it was definitely the best timed pandemic ever for the ruling classes around the world. Made the useless eaters, the world over, stop protesting...except for the ones that the same ruling class needed to further the destruction of America.

[Spartacus]

21 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

No matter intentional or not, it was definitely the best timed pandemic ever for the ruling classes around the world. Made the useless eaters, the world over, stop protesting...except for the ones that the same ruling class needed to further the destruction of America.

anyone that still thinks Covid was an accident is delusional

 

[Ann]

From a heavily reacted FIOA:
 

 

[Ann]

Friday news dump

 

 

Declassified report on COVID origins

[Spartacus]

what a shock!

getting jabbed increases the risk of being hospitalized

 

so much for the jab offering any benefits whatsoever

 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/covid-vaccinated-more-likely-to-be-hospitalized-cdc-data_5335428.html?utm_source=healthtop5noe&src_src=healthtop5noe&utm_campaign=htop5-2023-06-25&src_cmp=htop5-2023-06-25&utm_medium=email&est=%2FsG5Fp8zNoMEHjhnrw7KR%2FBFFiMICdBaxSBnt2tnhieP6IeS%2B8kjaW1m370l1qY%3D

 

The effectiveness against hospitalization plummeted to negative 8 percent for people who received one of the old COVID-19 vaccines, according to data from a CDC-run hospital network.

 

A dose of one of the updated bivalent vaccines moved the protection above zero, to 29 percent, but the protection fell back to negative 8 percent beyond 89 days, the data show.

 

From September 2022 to May 2023, immunocompromised adults in the same network who only received an old vaccine had just 3 percent protection against hospitalization.

 

A bivalent shot increased the protection to 39 percent, although the shielding was reduced to 11 percent beyond 119 days.

 

Dr. Robert Malone, who helped invent the messenger RNA technology utilized by the vaccine companies in their vaccines, said that the negative effectiveness is consistent with prior data such as a study from the Cleveland Clinic that found each successive vaccine dose increased the risk of infection.

 

Other papers have also estimated that protection against infection turns negative over time. Some datasets have indicated that vaccinated people were at higher risk of hospitalization, long seen as a surrogate for severe disease.

[B-Man]